**THE TRUTH ABOUT FORCE OF ATTRACTION**

Let's revisit again all values in the formula

**, which describes the Law of Gravitation, formulated by Isaac Newton.***F = Gm1 * m2 / r²*

*1) An elementary particle is the main participant of gravity.*
Isaac Newton deduced the Law of Universal Gravitation, based on observations of motion of celestial bodies.

He laid great groundwork in order to fully understand what a phenomenon of attraction is. He laid a foundation, but this is not enough. Newton talked about attraction of objects of macrocosm and has not spread this phenomenon to microcosm. This is understandable. After all, at his life, humanity has not yet opened a microcosm - not chemical elements, not elementary particles.

The task of modern physics is precisely to grasp by its laws all that is in the universe, in particular, to extend the phenomenon of attraction (gravitation) to objects of microcosm. As long as this is not done, there will be separate from each other

**.***gravitational interaction, strong interaction and magnetism*
Once physics will make an elementary particle as the main party of the Law of universal gravitation, this problem will disappear by itself, and all three of these interactions in the minds of scientists merge into one.

And while carriers of gravitational interaction are only celestial bodies – i.e. it’s a Newton 's legacy. But celestial bodies are not built of chemical elements and chemical elements are not built of elementary particles?

However, modern science is still afraid to let go of the fatherly hand of Newton and move on its own. Need, we need to do it! Necessary to transform an elementary particle of a "passive observer" of the process of gravitation of celestial bodies into the sole cause of this process.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*2) You do not consider acceleration of gravity as a cause of depending of force of attraction on the distance.*

*If anyone believes that increasing of speed of a falling solid or liquid body as shortening the distance between it and the center of the planet can be seen as evidence that Force of Attraction increases with decreasing a distance between objects, it is a wrong conclusion.*

__The reason for acceleration of the body during its free fall - not reducing the distance to the center of the planet, and inertia of the falling body__**We consider in detail the reasons for acceleration of freely falling bodies in the book “**

*!***”.**

*Mechanics of bodies*
There is a proof of our arguments. A body can achieve the same speed at different heights of fall. It depends on the magnitude of path traveled by it in the atmosphere. The longer it is, the greater the speed is. A body may reach a certain velocity and near the surface and somewhere at high altitude. As you can see, this fact contradicts the conclusions of modern physics. It claims that at a certain height the rate of fall must have a certain value, which must be a constant. So it follows from Newton ’s law of gravity. But in practice it is not. Consequently, it is not Force of Gravity is the reason for the growth of velocity of the body during its free fall.

The true cause of acceleration – is inertia of body motion, i.e. self-sustaining movement. It’s an impulse.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*3) The distance between gravitationally interacting bodies.*
Does the distance between gravitationally interacting objects affect the magnitude of Force of Attraction?

The answer – “yes”. Distance to the object with Field of Attraction affects the value of Force of Attraction, caused by this object in the studied particle.

As already mentioned, a particle is a sphere and if moving away from it, the volume of space surrounding the particle will increase concentrically. Accordingly, the farther away from the particle, the bigger is an amount of Ether surrounding the particle. Each particle with Force of Attraction absorbs Ether from the ambient ethereal field at a certain speed. The speed of absorption of Ether by the particle - this is originally inherent to this particle a value of the Field of Attraction. However, the farther away from a particle, the greater is an amount of Ether will surround it. Accordingly, the farther away from a particle, the smaller will be the rate at which Ether is closer to a given particle (i.e., the smaller the speed of an ethereal flow) - i.e. the smaller is the value of the Field of Attraction. Thus, we say, first, about the value of the Field of Attraction originally inherent to this particle, and second, about the value of the Field of Attraction at a certain distance from the particle.

Accordingly, the farther away an investigated particle is from the particle with the Field of Attraction, causing in it the Force of Gravity, the less is the value of this Force.

For example, let’s consider such a case. Some particle interacts with two particles forming Fields of Attraction. However, the Gravity Field of one of these particles is greater than the Field of Attraction of the second particle. Nevertheless, all ultimately determine the distance at which these particles will be situated from the investigated particle. And it may happen that a particle with a larger Field of Attraction causes a smaller Force of Attraction - if it will be much farther than a particle with smaller Field of Attraction.

## Комментариев нет:

## Отправить комментарий